News

Updates on standards, community and pilot work.

OSC collects public posts, event notes and insights for the next working phase. Posts distinguish announcements, working drafts and pilot findings so readers can see which claims are reviewed and which questions remain open.

Review published OSC updates Check OSC events

News

Read updates by decision, learning status and next step.

The overview shows published short updates from the Open Skills Consortium. It separates announcements, expert insights and participation calls from editorial templates.

The filters show or hide news items in the overview.

Research Published post

Globale Behaviour-Anker: Vektorbasierte Skills-Ontologie im OSC

Das OSC beschreibt eine weltweit anwendbare, vektorbasiert validierte Knowledge-Graph-Ontologie mit Behaviour Anchors, Expertenvalidierung und GraphRAG-fähiger Schlusslogik.

  • Classification: veröffentlichter OSC-Working draft.
  • Next step: fachlichen Review oder Participationsweg prüfen.
Beitrag lesen

Announcement Published post

Open Skills Consortium build-up phase

The consortium is preparing working groups, partner conversations and reference artifacts for open skills data, evidence and governance.

  • Decision: build-up phase, working groups and reference artifacts are named publicly.
  • Next step: prepare partner conversations and artifact reviews.
Beitrag lesen

Community Published post

Call for participation

Organizations can contribute requirements for skills data, competency evidence and pilot ideas to the next phase.

  • Participation: requirements, data models and pilot ideas are collected.
  • Next step: choose a suitable contact path or working-group context.
Beitrag lesen

Classification

What information an update must provide.

News remains visible as published content only when context, decision or learning status and a traceable next step are clear.

Published decision

What was decided, prioritized or opened for the next review?

Learning status

Which domain insight, open question or practical experience is documented?

Next step

Who can review, contribute or move what into a working group?